Sample report
This is what the engine does to a draft.
A fictional settlement draft, seeded with the mistakes real drafts make — cross-examined by the platform's actual engines. Nothing below is staged: this page re-runs the completeness review, the Opposing Counsel Pass™, the agreement stress test, the discovery self-audit mirror, the citation resolution, and the Bluebook format pass live on every visit.
This is a sample — every name and number is fictional. The findings are real engine output.
Run it on my document →Settlement Term Sheet — Morales v. Morales (fictional)
SETTLEMENT TERM SHEET (DRAFT FOR MEDIATION)
1. Parties. Maria Morales ("Wife") and Daniel Morales ("Husband"), married 2014, two minor children.
2. Equitable Distribution. The marital home is awarded to Wife, subject to refinance within [DAYS] days. Retirement accounts divided per § 61.075. Husband keeps the 2022 truck.
3. Time-Sharing. The parties shall follow a 2-2-5-5 schedule during the school year and waive the financial disclosures otherwise required, effective on entry of judgment.
4. Child Support. Husband shall pay child support of $[AMOUNT] per month pursuant to § 61.30 and the parties' worksheet. Support and time-sharing are independent obligations; see Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1997) on fees.
5. Modification. Either party may seek changes by motion to modify the final judgment if circumstances change. See also § 61.999 regarding future review.
6. Attorney's Fees. Each party bears their own fees and costs.Completeness — the statutory categories
- ✓Equitable distribution of assets/liabilities
- ◌Debt allocation
- ◌Spousal support position
- ✓Financial disclosure status
Opposing Counsel Pass™ — 4 findings
- attack
Retirement division without instrument mechanics
A percentage split with no QDRO/instrument language, valuation date, or gains/losses treatment is where post-judgment fights live. The drafting side usually wins the ambiguity.
- exposure
Spousal-support silence reads as an open issue
If alimony isn't addressed as waived, reserved, or set (§ 61.08 forms/duration), silence invites a later claim. State a position even if it is 'none requested'. [61.08]
- attack
Modification styled as a motion
Modification of a final judgment proceeds by SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION, not motion, unless a specific rule allows motion practice — a motion-to-modify is the procedural error opposing counsel moves to strike first. [12.110]
- attack
2 unfilled placeholder(s) — instant credibility attack
Blanks like [DAYS], [AMOUNT] tell the other side the document was never finished. Nothing with a bracket survives a hearing.
Citations — resolved against the corpus
- Fla. Stat. § 61.075✓ resolved · #0375d2110b
- Fla. Stat. § 61.30✓ resolved · #c213bdb770
- § 61.999◌ flagged — not in the corpus
Placeholders — 2 unfilled: [DAYS], [AMOUNT]
Agreement stress test — 2/6 required elements present
Element-completeness of the MSA against the statutory terms a Florida court expects — deterministic, each keyed to a rule.
- ✗Division of assets§ 61.075
- ✗Division of debts / liabilities§ 61.075
- ✗Alimony addressed (awarded or waived)§ 61.08
- ✓Child support consistent with the guidelines§ 61.30
- ✓Parenting plan addressed / incorporated§ 61.13
- ✗Financial disclosure acknowledged§ 12.285
Discovery self-audit mirror — does not serve
A discovery request a party here might draft, read by the same deficiency engine we point at the other side — before it goes out the door.
- high
Overbreadth — dragnet phrasing hands them the objection
“any and all” is the phrase the other side's lawyer reads twice. Name the categories: which accounts, which records, which period.
- medium
No date bound
No period stated — an unbounded demand reads as burden. Fence the time.
- medium
No concrete categories
Name document kinds (statements, returns, messages) — particularity is the difference between an order and an objection.
- medium
Child-adjacent demand
Anything reaching the child routes through the best-interest issue and, for testimony, the 12.407 gate.
Uncontested Command — the qualifier reads this matter: complex-but-agreed
The same fictional matter, through the agreed-path engines: the qualifier routes (never determines), and the alignment engine shows why a global “we agree” checkbox doesn't exist here — one topic's positions differ, so the matter is not agreed, and it says so.
outcome
uncontested-with-children
complexity lane
yellow
alignment
2/9 topics
- Property divisionaligned
- Alimonydifferent
- Parenting schedulealigned
Based only on the answers you entered, your matter currently appears as described below. This is not a legal determination that your case is uncontested or eligible for any path — and if a participating attorney is engaged, eligibility for their service is their decision, not this screen's.
Case citations — Bluebook format
- warning [reporter-spacing] — Reporter "So.2d" has nonstandard spacing.→ Use "So. 2d".
Get this for your document
Paste or upload any Florida family-law draft — the same engines run in seconds, free, and your text never leaves the browser except to resolve citations.
Run the Opposing Counsel Pass →Fictional matter; deterministic engine output recomputed on every visit. Opposing Counsel Pass™ is a trademark of LegalDraft Technologies LLC. Legal information, not legal advice.